"Yet again, the Government simply expects responsible landlords to shoulder even greater risks without any consultation about the likely impact"
- Ben Beadle - NRLA
Amendments proposed by the Government will reverse plans to enable landlords to require tenants to have suitable insurance to cover potential damage by pets. It comes as the House of Lords prepares to debate the Bill at Report stage next week.
The changes come despite the Housing Secretary having previously argued that enabling landlords to request tenants have insurance would mean “no one is left unfairly out of pocket.”
Whilst landlords will no longer be able to require tenants with pets to have suitable insurance, there will remain a presumption that they will accept tenants with pets, unless there is a good reason not to. Ultimately, it will be for the courts and the planned Ombudsman for the private rented sector to rule on these matters.
The NRLA warns this move will make it far harder for tenants with pets to access rental housing.
“This is a shoddy and outrageous way to make law. Ministers keep talking about how the Bill works for responsible landlords, and yet they seem incapable of speaking to those representing them," said NRLA chief executive Ben Beadle. “Yet again, the Government simply expects responsible landlords to shoulder even greater risks without any consultation about the likely impact."
He added, “It comes on top of plans which allow tenants to build higher levels of rent arrears, expect landlords to shoulder the cost of delays to an already sclerotic courts system, and make it harder for tenants with poor or no credit ratings to demonstrate their ability to sustain a tenancy.
“Whilst the Government might say that they are fighting their corner, it is tenants who will lose out as landlords become more risk-averse.”
