Homeowners, landlords and first-time-buyers cynical about Autumn Budget

Warren Lewis
24th November 2017

A new poll, conducted by, has shown that the majority of homeowners, landlords and first-time buyers are not confident that targets laid out in the Autumn Budget will be met, or that it will address the current housebuilding crisis.

The Autumn Budget announced an extensive housebuilding agenda that would see an extra 300,000 homes a year being built by the mid-2020s, a 100% increase in council tax for empty properties, and an exemption on stamp duty for first-time buyers buying homes for less than £500,000. polled more than 500 people for their comments and views immediately following these announcements to gain insight into how the housing element of the budget was received by the general public.

First-time buyers were split on the announcement that stamp duty would not apply to their first home (providing it was less than £300,000 or the first £300,000 of any property under £500,000). A property sold at £490,000 to a first-time buyer would therefore pay stamp duty of £9,500 under this scheme, whereas a property sold at £510,000 would pay £15,500 in stamp duty regardless of who bought it. Around 53% were encouraged by the news and felt they would be able to buy their first home sooner as a result, whereas 26% stated it wouldn't affect their purchasing decision. A further 21% felt it actually discouraged them, with one noting that flats in London are often substantially above the £500,000 cap.

In addition, 44% of first-time buyers stated that the government wasn't doing enough to help them buy, with one noting that much of the problem lay with the issue of salary multiples, particularly for those working in critical services.

Empty properties have been the target of substantial criticism, yet landlords were broadly confident. The majority would factor any additional council tax costs into the rent if this affected them, with around 29% stating that it wouldn't affect them anyway. One noted that there should be a mechanism to evaluate why properties are empty, stating that there could be reasons other than just a lack of will to let it out.

Targets are unlikely to be met

A huge 71% of respondents believed that targets were unlikely to be met with respect to housebuilding. Respondents commented that a greater volume of cheaper homes were needed, but they were unlikely to be built because of the need for higher margins, with land values and land banks being perceived as a problem. One of the solutions announced in the budget was to remove the cap on Housing Revenue Accounts for certain local councils, which may go some way to solving this issue.

Another area of concern was in planning laws, with 61% stating that planning laws do affect the number of houses being built. A similar percentage stated that greenbelt planning permissions should not be relaxed, with many commenting that brownfield sites should be used instead. Brownfield sites proved to be a popular solution, primarily because there was a perception that derelict sites were an eyesore and that they were underutilised.

The poll suggests that the housing aspect of this budget has not been met with approval from the general public, with a large number questioning its aims and claims. Many felt that the priority should be focused on planning reform, prioritising social housing and utilising brownfield sites, and a large proportion felt that the stamp duty aspects would not affect them.

Related articles
More from Finance
Latest from Financial Reporter
Latest from Commercial Reporter