First Homes: A year on

Despite much fanfare from the Government about “supporting people to own their home and make homeownership a reality,” there has been limited take-up by housebuilders and a lukewarm reception from local authorities.

Related topics:  Property,  Planning,  Property Market
Richard Lundy | Carter Jonas
25th January 2023
FTB 77
"In the few schemes that have started selling First Homes, they have reportedly proven very popular and attracted a lot of interest"

It is a year since First Homes became a consideration in planning applications.

The requirement has not been established long enough for there to be a clear picture of the popularity of First Homes among buyers, but there are some significant downsides in comparison to other forms of affordable housing.

Firstly, a brief reminder of what First Homes are. It is a national planning policy requirement to provide a minimum of 25% of the affordable housing units within a development as First Homes.

These are discounted by at least 30% against market value (up to 50% subject to local plans), with the discount secured in perpetuity by Section 106 agreements. The discounted prices are subject to caps of £250,000, or £420,000 in London. Eligibility is also limited to a maximum household income of £80,000 (£90,000 in London).

Councils have largely been non-committal on First Homes in their local plans. Many have issued interim position statements confirming that First Homes are now a policy requirement, but caveat that non-compliance can be justified by viability testing. Most have put off stipulating a specific discount, instead adopting the 30% minimum in the absence of evidence to support higher discounts. There are notable exceptions such as South Lakeland DC which has set the discount at 40%, and Sevenoaks DC at 50%.

In London, rented tenure products have remained a priority. The GLA issued a Practice Note in July 2021 stressing its preference for Social Rent and London Affordable Rent over First Homes. In March this year, Camden became the first local authority to formally reject First Homes in its planning policy, setting a precedent for others to do the same. Camden stated that it would continue to prioritise the delivery of affordable housing at rents related to local incomes instead of First Homes.

This is unsurprising in high-value areas such as Camden. Recent schemes in the borough have starting prices of over £500,000, meaning a substantial discount would be required for homes to fall under the £420,000 price cap. Even so, buyers would require a hefty deposit and given the First Homes eligibility cap on household income of £90,000, there is a limited market for those who can both qualify for and afford a home under the scheme. Research has shown that across London, just 12% of first-time buyer households would have the required income for an average two-bedroom flat under the First Homes scheme. In pricier boroughs such as Camden, this would be even lower.

Affordability is clearly an issue. In London, the average deposit for a first-time buyer stands at around £115,000 according to Halifax. Nationally, it is circa £54,000. This affordability problem has been exacerbated by soaring interest rates on new mortgages and the withdrawal of the number of mortgages offering over 90% loan-to-value (LTV).

As an ‘intermediate tenure’ (a form of affordable housing provided at a below-market cost but without the more substantial subsidy of social rent), First Homes can limit the provision of other types of affordable housing, such as Shared Ownership. Shared Ownership, however, is more accessible because a deposit and mortgage are only required on as little as 25% of the value. Requiring a deposit and mortgage on 70% of the value, First Homes are within the reach of fewer potential homeowners.

Nevertheless, in the few schemes that have started selling First Homes, they have reportedly proven very popular and attracted a lot of interest. Significantly, all these schemes have been outside London where homes are more affordable.

Housebuilder clients inform us that, generally, they prefer more established forms of intermediate tenures such as Shared Ownership. For housebuilders, there are several disadvantages to First Homes. Firstly, whereas other first-time buyer initiatives such Help to Buy have been targeted at selling private homes, First Homes must be sold by the developer, in direct competition with the private homes. This increases sales risk and exposes the developer in the event of a fall in prices.

A further problem is that First Homes are restricted to an open market sales rate, rather than sale in bulk to a Registered Provider with payment in instalments during construction. This reduces the IRR or return on capital expenditure because the revenue is received at a later date. Financing costs also increase because the receipts cannot be used to offset the construction costs.

A further issue for developers is that due to the price cap on First Homes of £250,000 nationally, and £420,000 in London, large discounts on market value in excess of 30% will be required in many areas. Consequently viability, and therefore the overall of affordable housing that can be delivered is reduced.

In summary, First Homes face various issues from multiple angles. Many local authorities would prefer to provide rental properties which tackle genuine affordability issues. First Homes also present disadvantages to developers who would rather provide traditional affordable housing. And for many buyers, prices remain unaffordable, particularly during current economic uncertainty and reduced availability of mortgages.

More like this
Latest from Financial Reporter
Latest from Protection Reporter
to our newsletter

Join a community of over 20,000 landlords and property specialists and keep up-to-date with industry news and upcoming events via our newsletter.