North East hit with £19m council house repair bill

North East hit with £19m council house repair bill
What is even more intriguing is the question of what exactly this money is being spent on

According to a new report, 10,000 Tyne and Wear council houses which became vacant last year required £19m of improvements before they were in a fit state to rent again – with only £350,000 of costs recovered from the tenants who caused the damage.

Freedom of Information requests from North East renting reform campaigner, Ajay Jagota, reveal Newcastle, North Tyneside, South Tyneside, Gateshead and Sunderland councils – or arms length management organisations responsible for managing council houses in the areas – spent £18,779747 bringing 9146 newly-vacant properties back into a condition where they could be rented out again in 2016.

This means council tenants in the region on average left their properties requiring £2053 of repairs.

Arms length management organisation Your Homes Newcastle spent the highest amount –forking out £7.5m bringing 1935 properties back into a rentable condition at an average cost of £3900.

The five Tyne and Wear authorities spent the following amounts on repairing vacant council housing stock in 2016:
1.    Newcastle - £7,546,767 (1935 properties)
2.    Sunderland - £4,500,000 (2500 properties)
3.    Gateshead – £4,232,072 (1613 properties)
4.    North Tyneside – £2,500,908 (1408 properties)
5.    South Tyneside – Refused to disclose figure (1690)

South Tyneside council refused to disclose how much it cost to return 1690 properties to a fit state to be rented out– but did admit that it had recovered 95% of £99,464 of repairs caused by tenant damage.

North Tyneside was able to recover 48% of these costs (£117,452) and Your Homes Newcastle 35% (£123,211). Gateshead Council and Gentoo, who manage council homes in Sunderland, were unable to supply these figures.


Ajay Jagota, founder of deposit-free renting solution Dighted, said: “These figures reveal a worrying disparity among the North East council’s performances when it comes to council housing and in particular their record keeping and ability to recover losses caused by tenant damage.

Not only do some councils seem to be totally unaware how much it cost them to repair malicious damage to their properties and how much of that money they were able to recover, South Tyneside claim it will be would be too much work to find out how much money they spent on repairs at all – information supplied willingly and apparently effortlessly by neighbouring authorities.

The £19m figure this isn’t even the true scale of the costs as the councils would also have lost income from these properties whilst repairs were carried out.

What is even more intriguing is the question of what exactly this money is being spent on. Most council properties are rented out unfurnished, so it’s hard to tell what damage to these homes could not be attributed to tenants but required more than £2000 of urgent repairs.

Private landlords wouldn’t have the resources to manage losses of this scale and in a time of tough budgets it may be the case that some North East councils need to seriously rethink how they manage their social housing stock and in particular how they recover the costs of tenant damage”.

Join our mailing list:

Leave a comment



Latest Comments

IrisJ.
IrisJ. 19 Jul 2017

Great advice, but may I also add that when buying an already built home, make sure you do all of the proper inspections. Most importantly pest inspection because people tend to get surprised when they

view article
IrisJ.
IrisJ. 17 Jul 2017

The third point is, in my opinion, the most important one. People have become too inconsiderate and careless when it comes to rented properties. If a landlord wants to protect their property, regular visits...

view article
cornishalan
cornishalan 10 Jul 2017

Added to the cost of purchasing these village properties are the above average maintenance costs. Particularly where the property is a listed building or requires specialist building skills such as thatching...

view article
Jo Mullett
Jo Mullett 07 Jul 2017

Here in Swansea, known as the Japanese knotweed capital of the UK, it never fails to amazes me that people have no idea of the potential problems this invasive non-native plant can cause when buying or...

view article
NathanG
NathanG 05 Jul 2017

McDonalds, for example, have been purchasing their real estate on prime locations for years. If something happens to the company they'll have invaluable assets that will be able to save them. We might

view article
Jonah
Jonah 04 Jul 2017

Graham: surprised to see you cite the "extra tax liability" as capping out at ?560. It doesn't - the extra tax is exponential, as it is levied on the income (i.e the inflating level of rental income you...

view article
Dianne Griffen
Dianne Griffen 29 Jun 2017

Be very wary of anyone bringing you deals that they have ?found? and want to ?sell on to you? or ?joint venture? with you on ? you need a proper legal contract for this, involve a RICs surveyor to confirm...

view article
jason hadzikostas
jason hadzikostas 28 Jun 2017

The most important thing is a budget. Students have to manage their spendings in food, house maintenance, books and many other things. According to me, student Studios are the perfect option for them as...

view article
SecomTech
SecomTech 22 Jun 2017

AT Last...This was discussed years ago and there was a move towards landlords registering their bad tenants on a database..(can't remember where) It seems a logical step though our leaders will probably...

view article
Bertrand
Bertrand 02 Jun 2017

How about the Welsh Govt introducing a scheme to protect landlords against "rogue" tenants who are then taken to court for criminal damage to the properties they trash. Pretty unlikely I suspect and politically...

view article
AmberMorris
AmberMorris 25 May 2017

"Please don't pick a novelty tune-playing doorbell. They're not 'fun'. They're stupid." Laughed a lot to this. It's actually true, though.

view article
Oliver Conway
Oliver Conway 18 May 2017

Making a neat inventory is a good idea, but if the seller is not willing to provide it, can the buyer demand it?

view article

Related stories

More articles from Property