Stamp Duty abolished: Property industry reacts

Stamp Duty abolished: Property industry reacts

The Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, has delivered his second budget and used it to urge the UK to "seize the opportunities" from Brexit while tackling deep-seated economic challenges "head on".

As many expected, there was a larger focus on housing than in previous budgets, announcements included local authorities to be allowed to levy 100% council tax surcharge on empty homes, £44bn injected over the next 5 years to support housing market, promises of 300k new homes built per year and most notably the abolishion of Stamp Duty for first-time buyer purchases up to £300,000.

As ever, the property industry was quick to respond. Here's what they're saying:

Paul Shamplina, Founder of Landlord Action, reacts to changes to Universal Credit scheme: “The Government appears to have bowed to the volume of criticism levelled at its flagship Universal Credit scheme and a realisation there is a range of fundamental issues which need to be urgently addressed. Mounting evidence pointed to the fact significant hardship was being experienced by claimants due to, amongst other things, having to wait up to 6 weeks before the first payment.

Changes announced by the Chancellor, included removing the 7 day waiting period, before eligibility commences; access to a full months’ advance (loan), instead of current 50%, payable within five days of applying; extending the repayment period for advances from six to 12 months, will undoubtedly help ease concerns. The Chancellor also announced that new housing benefit claimants could continue to receive it for an extra two weeks, while waiting for their universal credit payments to start. This news will be warmly welcomed by tenants and landlords alike and should help reduce rent arrears at the point of transfer to Universal Credit.

However, I do still have a number of concerns. The reduction in the waiting period by seven days doesn’t apply to the vast majority of claimants anyway, so this will only help the minority. Of greater issue is the increasing complexity of the scheme; staff assessing Universal Credit claims have not been properly trained, meaning mistakes are being made on an all too regular basis; and as the Full Service rollout expands, more complicated cases will arise, causing even more challenges for DWP staff.

Some experienced commentators have suggested the changes, whilst welcomed, represent “sticking a plaster” to a fatally flawed system which requires re-engineering, rather than tinkering and have grave doubts concerning DWP’s ability and willingness to alter the direction of travel. Until the system has proved itself “fit for purpose”, landlords will remain cautious about renting to those in receipt of Universal Credit for fear of unsustainable levels of rent arrears.”

Russell Quirk, founder and CEO of eMoov.co.uk, commented:  "Today’s budget has amounted to little more than the annual dose of rhetoric and empty announcements of bold plans, extolling a robust intent to build more housing.

The Treasury’s ‘pledge’ to build more homes is a story we’ve been told many times before, but these well-worn, heady platitudes have not been fulfilled since way, way back in 1969 when the Beatles were topping the charts.

The likelihood of hitting the ambitious target of 1 million homes by 2050 is slim, to say the least, and one that is unlikely to be hit. The ‘urgent’ review of the gap in planning permission and the actual building of houses is also far too little too late and should have been implemented many budgets ago.  

The Government must actually execute on a housing plan if the current housing crisis is to be remedied and not just grab headlines with their unqualified so-called intentions. This problem is not just about money. It’s about action and it’s about listening to experts within the industry for once.

A cut in stamp duty for first-time buyers is the only real sign of good intent by Chancellor Hammond and one that may help reignite the property market momentarily, but some may say acts as yet another diversion from the elephant in the room of a continued failure to build a meaningful number of affordable homes. Indeed a cynical electoral bribe."

Paula Higgins, chief executive, Homeowners Alliance, had this to say: "Finally the government has taken some bold action on the housing crisis. Stamp Duty robs buyers of much needed cash at the worst possible time and it’s been obvious for years that something needed to be done about it. Back in 2013 we launched our campaign to abolish Stamp Duty for first timers on the back of our report Stamping on Aspiration and I’m delighted the government has finally seen sense and recognised just how unfair and damaging this tax is. Under the new proposal 80% of first time buyers will not pay any Stamp Duty.
 
I would have liked to see more help for last time buyers too such as a Stamp Duty cut for downsizers. Freeing up larger family homes is essential for the fluidity of the market but there is currently no incentives to downsize and a lack of suitable properties to move too.

Mr Hammond should also have addressed the Stamp Duty surcharge issue for buyers who purchase their next property before selling their current home. Under the new system introduced last year these buyers are forced to cough up the extra 3% and must then go through the arduous process of claiming it back. The fact that refunds are currently running at £10m a month shows how flawed this system is. It would make much more sense for the Duty to be collected six months or a year down the line if the property isn’t sold. Home movers should not be penalised for the sluggish market.

While we obviously welcome the announcement that the government will build 300,000 new homes it’s worth remembering that the financial year 2016/17 was the first year since before the economic crisis that the government hit its housing target (of 200,000). It’s all very well acknowledging how many homes are needed but the government hardly has a good track record of achieving this."

Mark Hayward, Chief Executive, NAEA Propertymark comments on the stamp duty reforms announced in today’s Autumn Budget: “The announcement today from the Government to abolish stamp duty for FTBs will have a positive impact on the market. It’s a smart move to ensure the dream of homeownership for young people can become a reality and will help buyers across the UK, including London and the South East where property prices are higher.

We do however need to realise that this move will increase the demand for FTB properties and if we don’t have the supply it will push prices up. We have seen this in areas where Help to Buy is offered, as it attracts a great deal of interest from FTBs.

In terms of the Government’s plans to build 300,000 new homes a year, it is yet another pledge to increase the number of new homes created. While we welcome this news, we have historically had these announcements from Government to accelerate housebuilding which has not been delivered. It is not a question of ‘how many’, it’s a question of ‘how’.”

Jeremy Leaf, north London estate agent and a former RICS chairman, says: "The Chancellor's comments were encouraging as much for what he did say as what he didn’t. Firstly, the reduction in stamp duty at the lower level is hopefully just the tonic the market needs to improve transactions for first-time buyers in particular, in both lower and higher-priced areas. This should have a knock-on effect for transactions right through the market and the overall economy. The fact it is a permanent move adds welcome certainty to those buying now and those thinking of buying in the future.

The other bit of good news is that the Chancellor did not increase the rate of tax on buy-to-let investors. This would have had a detrimental effect on the supply of affordable property to rent as investors have been in retreat for some time.

We would have liked to see more encouragement of local authorities and housing associations to borrow more for new genuinely affordable homes if we are to have a realistic chance of hitting the 300,000 units per annum target that the Chancellor seeks.

We hope Homes England speeds up the delivery of housing solutions rather than talking about what needs to be done."

Simon Heawood, CEO and Founder of Bricklane.com on the abolishing of stamp duty for first time buyers for purchases up to £300,000 “While welcome, abolishing stamp duty is a drop in the ocean given the affordability challenge of getting Generation Rent onto the property ladder. Increasing supply of the right kinds of housing will also go some way to stopping ever-rising house prices, but many of Generation Rent still face the prospect of waiting many years to buy their own home.

The focus on bridging the housing generational gap must lie on the all-important first rung of the ladder – saving up for a deposit. The issue of housing supply and price is important, but looking at measures to support Generation Rent’s ability to get together a deposit is crucial.

The current situation will mean a continued reliance on the private rental sector so it’s welcome news that the government will be opening a consultation on how to encourage landlords to offer longer tenancies. Some forward-thinking landlords have been offering more stable tenancies for a while now and it is a great win-win – tenants get greater stability, enabling them to feel more at home, whilst our investors have the benefit of higher occupancy rates.”

Nick Sanderson, CEO, Audley Group, commented: “Cutting stamp duty for first time buyers will save them thousands of pounds on the purchase of their first homes and will remove one of the many barriers in the purchase market against consistently rising house prices. But the focus on the bottom end of the market alone is a blinkered focus and continues to ignore where much of the greatest potential in the market sits: the over 65s.
 
It is predicted that by 2037 there will be a 70% increase in the over 65 age group, yet the UK’s housing market is nowhere near prepared to meet the growing demand from first-time buyers, let alone to deliver retirement properties. Commitment to house building is welcome but not every first time buyer wants to move into a new build and stamp duty exemptions to help older buyers downsize would be far more cost neutral in the long-term. Two in five UK homes are under-occupied, of which half are occupied by those aged 50 to 69, in the main due to lack of quality accommodation for them to move into.
 
It’s time to address the facts: if we truly want to kick-start movement in the market, we need to stop continually plastering over the cracks and invest in quality housing options for the older generation.”

Benson Hersch, CEO of the Association of Short Term Lenders (ASTL), comments today on the Autumn Budget statement: “The Chancellor’s announcement that the Government will facilitate the building of 300,000 new homes a year, is welcome but ultimately we have heard promise after promise from successive Governments on house building, to little effect. Without a significant increase in social housing this is a pipe dream, especially as current figures include permitted development (offices to flats for example) rather than 'ground up' building.
 
For many, a house to call their own remains out of reach as the deposits required are still too high. Recent analysis undertaken by the ASTL of our membership shows that bridging loans are increasingly popular forms of finance for people looking to purchase their own homes. Such a trend demonstrates how alternative forms of finance are increasingly providing the solutions where Government should be and could be bridging the gap.”

Jeff Knight, Director of Marketing at Foundation Home Loans, said: “Of all the announcements to be pulled out of the red box this time round, the abolishment of stamp duty for first time buyers was one of the most highly anticipated. Now confirmed, it will certainly inject some more momentum into the purchase market and give those starting out a leg-up in the face of increasing house prices. However, maintaining the current rate of stamp duty for landlords will naturally cause them to ‘batten down the hatches’ and protect their income. A quarter of landlords said they would increase rents next year if there was no change in this policy - unsurprising given the raft of changes to buy to let.

In reality, the commitment to building more homes and addressing planning regulation is what we needed to address the supply and demand imbalance, but affordable homes do not have to equal ownership and there should also be a focus on developing good quality, affordable homes that can be rented. Doing this will not only support tenants while they save for a deposit, but will further open up PRS to the more motivated, professional landlords who can inject fresh energy and ideas into the market.” 


Rajiv Nathwani, Director of Quivira Capital & The Hertfordshire Group, says: “Ahead of today’s Budget there have been countless calls for the government to remove stamp duty for older homeowners – the theory being that this would encourage them to downsize, freeing up homes for younger families.
 
It is undoubtable that unattainable housing for young people, and high levels of stamp duty, are both problems that needs to be addressed. However, should the chancellor institute exclusive tax breaks for the older generation, this will not cut to the heart of the issue. The changes will neither ensure that larger homes are freed up, nor address the fact that those upsizing, i.e. young families, are penalised.
 
Instead, the government should be focusing on creating real incentives for the elderly to downsize, and protecting the younger generation from crippling stamp duty fees. This must include revealing the true tax figure to them, as most statistics don’t account for tax rebates owners will receive should they sell within three years, which is a key factor in encouraging investors to turn around, and therefore free up, properties quickly.”

Paresh Raja, CEO of bridging specialist MFS, said: "Initially introduced in an attempt stabilise the market, stamp duty reform in England is long overdue. Since April 2016, UK investors have been required to pay a minimum 3% loading on existing stamp duty fees for second property purchases. As a consequence of these reforms, stamp duty is now discriminating against people seeking to buy a property, with the amount of homes purchases blocked by stamp duty doubling over the past five years. Relaxing these tax measures will recognise the constructive role investors can play in addressing dwindling housing supply, such as short-term refurbishment projects to get more houses on the market, while mobilising the industry as a whole.”

Steve Burrows, managing director of LateRent and Landlord Secure, says: “Abolishing stamp duty is not enough. It’s oddly out of step that tenants are still unable to utilise rental payments as part of their credit profile to get a mortgage. We know this has been a rising frustration amongst renters for many years. It’s time for the government to sit up and listen to this often-overlooked market, and stop simply paying lip service to their own housing policies.”

Christian Faes, Co-Founder & CEO, LendInvest, said: "Philip Hammond has shown that this is a government that's finally ready to intervene in the property market, and this will be welcomed by industry. Now they must leverage the capacity of lenders in the market to get funds out to those that need it and can get Britain building, finally."

Parul Scampion, COO at Fruition Properties, comments: “Hammond’s plans to support smaller developers by improving access to funding, skills and land marks a positive step towards tackling the chronic lack of housing in the UK.

While encouraging to see that the Chancellor has acknowledged the need to invest significantly in training new construction workers, the Government needs to realise the scale of the problem particularly given the uncertainty around the availability of European workers following Brexit.  A lack of skilled workers has been an inhibiting factor for many years and will be one of the main barriers to delivering increased housing units particularly in London, even with this boost to training new construction workers.

By abolishing stamp duty for a healthy portion of first time buyer purchases, the Government has seized a golden opportunity to remove at least one element of the fiscal drag created by layers of incremental SDLT. This will go one step towards creating a healthy, frictionless process which will increase liquidity in the housing market and therefore mobility for the job market; both of which are important factors for a thriving economy. However, given the large revenues being earned by HMRC from SDLT,  we believe the government needs to go further reducing the drag on higher value properties and investors - important elements of a healthy, properly functioning property market.”

Lynda Clark, CEO of First Time Buyer Group (and editor of First Time Buyer Magazine) says: “It is about time that stamp duty was abolished for first time buyers purchasing a property under £300k; it has been an enormous stumbling block for those on the lowest rung of the ladder. This saving for 95% of first time buyers will not only help tens of thousands of first time buyers to take one step closer to homeownership, but it will help make other transactions further up the ladder possible. We should not forget that first time buyers are the lifeblood of the property market and by increasing incentives for buyers at entry level, the whole property cycle can function, providing a much-needed boost the market as a whole.

300,000 homes a year is quite an ambitious target and I very much hope that the Chancellor is not going to overpromise and underdeliver.  

Millennial first time buyers will welcome news that the government is going to attempt to rebalance the supply of affordable housing by building 300,000 more homes. If it’s not too late already, perhaps they too will be able to enjoy the same opportunities that generations before them have taken for granted.

For too long we have not been building enough homes, nor have we been building them quickly enough, and unfortunately for this generation house prices have risen to increasingly unaffordable levels. Supply has failed to match the much-increased demand for housing in the last 20 years and so building affordable homes is going to be key to help address this short fall.

Quality build and sustainability must remain at the core of any new homes proposed or once again we will run the risk of burdening future generations with another housing crisis plagued with insufficient and poor housing stock.”

Neil Cobbold, Chief Operating Officer of PayProp in the UK, comments: "The stamp duty cut will grab many headlines but leaves most of us in the industry wondering whether it solves any of the major problems the UK housing market is currently facing.

Incentivising first-time buyers further is no bad thing, but the fact remains that it is the limited number of homes available which is pushing up house prices and ultimately stopping people from getting on the property ladder.

It has become clear over the last few years that the government recognises the growth of the private rented sector as an alternative housing tenure.

For this reason, it could be more beneficial to focus on downsizing and planning laws to help free up much-needed stock for both owner-occupiers and private renters, rather than trying to help the younger generations buy property when it's clear that many are happy to rent for longer."

Katherine McCullough, development director of SME London property developer, Merchant Land, said: “The stamp duty exemption for buyers of properties up to the value of £300,000 and for the first £300,000 on a property priced up to £500,000 is great news for the housing market and a promising sign that vigour will return to the sector. We can also expect to see momentum building at the top end as a result, which will allow the rest of the market to move more freely, stimulating transactions at all levels.”

Join our mailing list:

Leave a comment



Latest Comments

Tony Gimple
Tony Gimple 09 Dec 2017

Linking professionalism to limited company borrowing is a flawed concept. Despite S24 etc., limited companies are the most tax inefficient way of running a property business and leave borrowers seriously...

view article
Evelyn Attwood
Evelyn Attwood 01 Dec 2017

It's normal. If you plan to buy a house in one of the most beautiful spots in the country you should pay a high price.

view article
Evelyn Attwood
Evelyn Attwood 01 Dec 2017

I think that the situation will be the same at December.

view article
Scott Garnet
Scott Garnet 06 Nov 2017

If you have a patio or a porch it is important to make sure that any connecting doors are secured. Good advice for sliding glass doors is replacing the panels with storm resistant glass and getting heavier...

view article
richardrawlings
richardrawlings 01 Nov 2017

What has not been mentioned here is the effect of not only higher interest payments, but also that these payments are less likely to be offsettable as a business cost due to the scaling back of mortgage...

view article
Kelvin Lloyd
Kelvin Lloyd 09 Oct 2017

IT is up, to the Planners. If they will only give permission for bungalows on certain (suitable) sites, they will be built.

view article
maggie swift
maggie swift 09 Oct 2017

It's just the beginning of the shocking rise.

view article
maggie swift
maggie swift 09 Oct 2017

I have recently read that the bungalows can provide social housing for elderly residents in London.

view article
zoe glover
zoe glover 05 Oct 2017

Update! Worst company I have ever dealt with. Undervalued a Cambridge property by over 100k, wont take on any evidence of valuation including a RICS valuation done 3 years ago for the very same value...

view article
Paul Edwards
Paul Edwards 27 Sep 2017

Its nonsense articles such as this that make it harder to get clients to realise just how difficult the market is out there. When you see Rightmove and there are more 'price reduced' then 'new' most days...

view article
Tom Allen
Tom Allen 20 Sep 2017

Absolutely agree with you!

view article
RyanGeo
RyanGeo 18 Sep 2017

A sharp correction would be a less dramatic expression to use. That is already underway in certain sectors in Reading where I practice as Chartered Surveyor

view article

Related stories

More articles from Property