Property Reporter



Deposit disputes rise by 25%

Line Spacing+- AFont Size+- Print Forward to a friend
Deposit disputes rise by 25%

The latest TDS stats show that there has been a steep 25% rise in tenancy deposit disputes, with one-third of agents making claims.

This escalation in disputes is a worrying trend for agents and landlords and the key question is, what gives them the best chance of winning a deposit dispute – an in-house or third party inventory?      

Many agents instruct an independent third party to combat any conflict of interest issues that may arise in the event of a dilapidations dispute.  But, according to Imfuna Let, the UK’s leading inventory software solution, the independence and impartiality of a third party report can always be called into question, where the landlord or the agent instructs and pays their favoured independent provider to produce it.

Howard Lester, Director of Balgores Property Group comments: “Since the introduction of the Tenant Deposit Scheme, we have seen a steady and sharp rise in disputes. Over the last few years, these have changed in nature from the situations where agreement just couldn't be reached between the landlord and tenant, to parties just trying their luck as the realisation kicks in that the process is free of charge.

In order to reduce the amount of disputes, Balgores Lettings has been steadily increasing the quality of its inventories, using several apps over the last few years, with more photos and better descriptions. Additionally, we have employed our own clerks, improved the quality of their inspections and introduced pre-checkout visits to offer tenants advice on which items are likely to lead to deductions, if not corrected before the final checkout.


We have experienced a 25% fall in disputes requiring TDS adjudication, compared with last year.  We believe that by working with top inventory software companies, employing our own well trained clerks, as well as having a member of our management team who specialises in negotiating settlements, we have been able to buck the trend of rising disputes.

Perhaps one of the biggest help in this reduction has been the introduction of pre-checkout visits, where we are able to show the tenant the original inventory three weeks before the checkout.  We find very few issues when the final inspection takes place.

To make this work to its best ability, we have always looked to use the clearest and most concise inventories, so we are in the process of transferring to Imfuna Let. The software’s before and after pictures convinced us to switch. As well as being great for the tenants, we have found that landlords are more willing to accept wear & tear, as they are able to see the process throughout the tenancy with mid-term property inspection reports being sent to them.

Over the last 12 months, more than 65% of disputes have been settled in favour of the landlords we represent.  This goes to prove that if you have a quality inventory prepared, properly recorded inspections and checkouts carried out, then you are less likely to end up in a dispute with the tenant.”

Jax Kneppers, Founder and CEO of Imfuna Let comments: “The tenancy deposit is the tenant's money and the onus lies with the landlord to provide indisputable proof of dilapidations before compensation can be awarded. The deposit scheme adjudicators are only concerned with the evidence presented in support of a compensation claim and not the source of the inventory report documentation.  Who actually instructs and completes the inventory is irrelevant and to date there is no legislation to the contrary, which is extremely unlikely to change at any time in the future.  

Instructing an independent third party will not free the managing agent from their obligation to obtain quotes in support of any proposed deposit deductions after the check-out, or to negotiate a settlement with a potentially difficult tenant, who may be hell bent on initiating a dispute with the deposit scheme, regardless. Not to mention the landlord, who may not understand the concepts of fair wear and tear and betterment and whose future custom may well be at risk if an adjudicator's decision is unfavourable, as a result of a poor quality report supplied by the agent's recommended provider.

Inventory providers' terms are full of disclaimers, including responsibility for accuracy, which ultimately lies with the landlord. Any admission of liability for an error on their part will probably revolve around the volume of business received from the agent, which again contradicts the independence issue.

We offer agents a world-class inventory software application, Imfuna Let, which produces detailed, professional and branded in-house inspections reports from just £1 each. The software also provides a valuable new income stream.”

Got something to say? Leave a comment below:

You must be logged in to leave a comment

More articles from Landlords

Landlords face big clean up at check-out

Scotland sees rent rises fall to three-year low

Rents accelerate to highest levels seen this year

Prime Central London lettings market hit by Brexit wobble

Landlord tip: 1 bed flats to achieve biggest capital gains over next 12 months

Student property sees surge in international investors



Latest from Financial Reporter

shutterstock_7358431.jpg

Just in
London growth offsets seasonal dip in Q1

Just in
1st Stop plans 'significant growth' after new investment

Nationwide to enter equity release market

Majority of advisers back Pensions Dashboard


Latest from Commercial Reporter

ASTL: Upward trend for bridging continues

Fleet makes criteria changes for limited company transfers

Are SME overdrafts dying out?

Rise of 'flatpack' lenders prompts warning to SMEs


Latest Comments

HMO Midlands Landlady
HMO Midlands Landlady 24 May 2016

Tenants disappearing into the night is common from shared houses ( licensed and un-licensed HMO's) often when they owe considerable rent- they remove all their possessions, leave key in room and tell other...

view article
CommercialTrust
CommercialTrust 20 May 2016

With the bulk of the market controlled by large developers, profit rather than necessity determine the pace at which homes are built. There are hundreds of thousands of plots that have planning permission...

view article
Johna
Johna 20 May 2016

"Easier said than done" is what I would say. Of course, it would be more than great to have more in quality and affordability, but I do not trust talk anymore.. What is said is not what is happening.

view article
Johna
Johna 20 May 2016

in my humble opinion being fair like THE most important! I myself have had bad experience with unfair landlords... not to mention that I know how to do a proper end of tenancy cleaning since I am a fantastic...

view article
richardrawlings
richardrawlings 18 May 2016

NB - even if we doubled our commission levels in the UK, we'd still be by far the cheapest agents in the entire world.

view article
Agent_PeeBee
Agent_PeeBee 18 May 2016

Clueless. Someone needs to take these people's computers away from them so they can do no more harm than they already have.

view article
richardrawlings
richardrawlings 18 May 2016

Nonsense! The cost of selling a house nowadays has little bearing on the fees charged. Don't believe your own spin on this. Fees have spiralled down to pathetic levels in areas where weak agents have allowed...

view article
Simon Oliver
Simon Oliver 16 May 2016

The best solution is to buy a property that has built-in income generating potential: a nice house with a couple of gites in the grounds is a good start. In France, the rune of thumb is that one 2-bedroomed...

view article
WPD
WPD 12 May 2016

I suggest the answer is to have the notary system being one legal person who represents both parties. Having experienced it a couple of times in France it was a dream compared to our dysfunctional system....

view article
warren
warren 03 May 2016

It's enough to make me weep into my Pimm's :(

view article
james anderson
james anderson 03 May 2016

The sad demise of the croquet lawn...

view article
CommercialTrust
CommercialTrust 11 Apr 2016

".. the stricter lending criteria will reduce the amount of buy-to-let lending by 10% to 20% in three years’ time." The PRA was actually referring to cumulative approvals here. What they believe is that...

view article

Latest Tweets