How early break clauses may effect the market value of your property

How early break clauses may effect the market value of your property

With regard to rent valuation, decided cases demonstrate that it can be difficult to determine what impact certain clauses in leases will have when a lease is renewed. HHJ Mitchell, who gave judgment on Britel Fund Trustees Limited v B&Q plc, elected to give due regard to the nature of comparables.

 The implications were that the market value was significantly discounted. Peter Lewis, Patner at Rosling King, discusses the dangers to landlords of early break clauses in commercial leases.

Britel Fund Trustees Limited (“Britel”) was the landlord of a retail DIY warehouse of approximately 37,000 square foot in Tottenham Hale Retail Park, and had applied for the grant of a new tenancy under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (the “1954 Act”). All the terms had been agreed with the tenant, B&Q plc (“B&Q”), save for the annual rent and interim rent. On the advice of an expert surveyor, Britel suggested an annual rent of £698,500 (or £18.90 per square foot) whereas B&Q, on the advice of its own valuer, argued for an annual rent of £281,000 (or £7.60 per square foot).

Of fundamental importance to the decision was the existence of an early mutual rolling break clause.

The parties agreed that there were two main issues:

- should allowance be made for a three month so called ‘rental holiday’?
- what is the open market rent for the lease with its break clause?

Applicable law

Section 34 of the 1954 Act stipulates that in default of an agreement between a tenant and landlord, a court may determine the rent payable under a tenancy granted by a lease, having regard to the terms of the tenancy, but disregarding matters including:

- any effect on rent of the fact that the tenant has or his predecessors in title have been in occupation of the premises;
- any goodwill attached to the premises by reason of the carrying on thereat of the business of the tenant; and
- any effect on rent of an improvement carried out by a person who was the tenant at the time the improvement was carried out, and who was not obliged to do so under an obligation owed to their immediate landlord.

Rent free period

In addressing whether allowance should be made for a three month ‘rental holiday’, HHJ Mitchell considered the conflicting decided cases. One school of thought appears to take a narrower approach, reluctant to import any factors not stipulated in the 1954 Act. On the other side, there is a greater willingness to give due regard to the comparables. The Court opted with the latter approach and one favoured in recent decisions by finding that a rent free period of three months would be granted and applied over the entire ten years of the lease. Further to this, the Court added that when considering comparables, like must be compared with like.

Open market rent

Complications arose due to the presence in the new lease of the early break clause.  The Court agreed with B&Q’s argument that the market rent should be determined on the basis that the hypothetical tenant would be a discounter (i.e. a tenant who only requires a quick fit out of the premises and trades at a discount rate) rather than as a DIY retailer.

This is because the mutual rolling break clause, which drew considerable attention in the valuation, meant that Britel could exercise the break when B&Q would have been trading for less than 2.5 years, when the time required to fit out the premises is considered. Indeed, both experts contended that no DIY retailer would have taken a lease with this early break clause. The Court found that the market rent payable by a discounter was £466,940 per annum whereas it would have been £603,100 for a DIY retailer. HHJ Mitchell made this valuation without the benefit of comparable evidence owing to the lateness of this concession at the hearing.

Having established that the hypothetical tenant would be a discounter, it was necessary to determine the discount to reflect the early break clause. The Court held that the discount for a DIY retailer would be 25 per cent whereas it would be 20 per cent for a discounter. After applying the discount, the valuation was found by the Court to be £373,700 per annum. This represents a striking difference to the £603,100 per annum valuation (assuming the lease did not have any break clause) HHJ Mitchell would have found for the landlord, had the early break clause not rendered the lease unsuitable for any retailers other than discounters.

Post-Britel Fund Trustees Limited lessons

There are no indications that the decision will be appealed. Landlords should consequently think carefully about inserting an early break clause into commercial leases and be mindful of who the hypothetical tenant is. It was illustrated in this case that both factors can have a pronounced impact on market value that is difficult to ignore. The Court firstly discounted the market value owing to the early break clause. The value was further reduced when the Court conceded to the opinion of the experts, who stated that no DIY retailers would accept the early break clause, meaning that the hypothetical tenant was not a “willing lessoree.”

The case also illustrates that a court may adjust the market rent to take into account a rent free period and that comparable evidence should be carefully reviewed to ensure the comparisons are on a like-for-like basis and appropriate adjustments made.

Join our mailing list:

Leave a comment

Latest Comments

brandonlee10 24 Jul 2017

The financial ramifications of the triggering of Article 50, the starting gun for Britain's departure from the EU, are far from clear. Buyers will be most cautious in London, given that buying a home in...

view article
IrisJ. 19 Jul 2017

Great advice, but may I also add that when buying an already built home, make sure you do all of the proper inspections. Most importantly pest inspection because people tend to get surprised when they

view article
IrisJ. 17 Jul 2017

The third point is, in my opinion, the most important one. People have become too inconsiderate and careless when it comes to rented properties. If a landlord wants to protect their property, regular visits...

view article
cornishalan 10 Jul 2017

Added to the cost of purchasing these village properties are the above average maintenance costs. Particularly where the property is a listed building or requires specialist building skills such as thatching...

view article
Jo Mullett
Jo Mullett 07 Jul 2017

Here in Swansea, known as the Japanese knotweed capital of the UK, it never fails to amazes me that people have no idea of the potential problems this invasive non-native plant can cause when buying or...

view article
NathanG 05 Jul 2017

McDonalds, for example, have been purchasing their real estate on prime locations for years. If something happens to the company they'll have invaluable assets that will be able to save them. We might

view article
Jonah 04 Jul 2017

Graham: surprised to see you cite the "extra tax liability" as capping out at ?560. It doesn't - the extra tax is exponential, as it is levied on the income (i.e the inflating level of rental income you...

view article
Dianne Griffen
Dianne Griffen 29 Jun 2017

Be very wary of anyone bringing you deals that they have ?found? and want to ?sell on to you? or ?joint venture? with you on ? you need a proper legal contract for this, involve a RICs surveyor to confirm...

view article
jason hadzikostas
jason hadzikostas 28 Jun 2017

The most important thing is a budget. Students have to manage their spendings in food, house maintenance, books and many other things. According to me, student Studios are the perfect option for them as...

view article
SecomTech 22 Jun 2017

AT Last...This was discussed years ago and there was a move towards landlords registering their bad tenants on a database..(can't remember where) It seems a logical step though our leaders will probably...

view article
Bertrand 02 Jun 2017

How about the Welsh Govt introducing a scheme to protect landlords against "rogue" tenants who are then taken to court for criminal damage to the properties they trash. Pretty unlikely I suspect and politically...

view article
AmberMorris 25 May 2017

"Please don't pick a novelty tune-playing doorbell. They're not 'fun'. They're stupid." Laughed a lot to this. It's actually true, though.

view article

Related stories

More articles from Special Features