Could Labours tenancy proposals cause landlords to exit the market?

According to new findings from the Association of Residential Letting Agents, 72% of its members believe that Labour’s proposed three-year tenancies, with a cap on rents will see landlords pull out the market, and lead to a decrease in the supply of rental property.

Related topics:  Landlords
Warren Lewis
27th April 2015
Cloud House

The monthly PRS report found that landlords in the North West and East Midlands would be most likely to pull out the market, with 84% of ARLA agents in these regions expressing concern.

As well as seeing a reduction in landlords and therefore supply of rental housing, three quarters of ARLA members (74%) believe the proposed three-year tenancy agreements with rent controls and strict rules to make it more difficult to evict tenants will not actually benefit tenants at all, up from 69% in February.

Almost two fifths (37%) of ARLA agents agree that the Conservatives’ pledge to build 200,000 new starter homes offered at 20% discount to first-time-buyers would be best for the private rented sector. This will enable a segment of the current British renting population to get on the housing market, freeing up more properties for renting, helping to ease supply and demand.

Supply and demand

The upcoming election is having an effect on the current levels of supply and demand for the PRS, as people hold out to see the outcome. Demand is down by 10% in March with just 36 house-hunters recorded, down from 40 in February. Supply is heading in the other direction, with a rise in the number of properties managed per branch; 192 properties in March, up from 184 the previous month. Rents continue to increase for some, as three in ten ARLA agents (32%) said that rents increased between February and March (the same increase as the previous month, 31%).

David Cox, Managing Director of ARLA comments: “The third ARLA Private Rental Sector Report identifies what those at the heart of the sector are most concerned with – and excited by – in regard to the upcoming General Election. A vast majority of ARLA letting agents are worried that Labour’s proposed three year tenancies with strict caps on rents will only cause the gap between supply and demand to widen. Flexible tenancies are what makes the sector work, if this changes, some landlords will be forced to exit the market and tenants are likely to automatically incur rent hikes and feel driven to stay in agreements for longer before getting on the housing ladder; thus not freeing up rental properties for other tenants.

The proposals are aimed at reducing opportunities for landlords to raise rents and to create stability for tenants, as Ed Miliband outlined yesterday. However, Labour’s proposals aren’t necessarily the solution. If you put a cap on rent increases above inflation, tenants are likely to experience automatic annual hikes. Whereas, in reality, landlords appreciate good tenants and would avoid raising rents to retain them. Our March report shows that the average time tenants stayed in a property is 17 months and a third (31%) of agents reported that they had successfully negotiated a rent reduction for tenants. So, if this law comes into play, instead of tenants getting a potential reduction, they may be more vulnerable to automatic increases.

It will be interesting to see what happens on May 7th. We need more homes and while house prices are still sky high with no signs of these dropping any time soon; getting onto the property ladder is a difficult feat. Therefore, renting a property is the only option for many. However, we are concerned that current government policy on housing cannot deliver what is required.”

Graham Davidson, managing director of Sequre Property Investment believes that Labour must realise that rogue landlords do not dominate the buy-to-let market.

He says: “The majority of the buy-to-let market are not rogue landlords but decent people - many have invested in bricks & mortar as an alternative form of pension and could have their businesses threatened. 1970s style rent controls will stifle the sector by discouraging investment, reducing the amount of available stock and driving up prices even further.

Increasing rental stock should be the priority, with an emphasis on the dedicated build to rent market.

Three year tenancies are impractical in reality and are simply not suitable for the majority of this young and increasingly mobile generation”.

More like this
Latest from Financial Reporter
Latest from Protection Reporter
CLOSE
Subscribe
to our newsletter

Join a community of over 20,000 landlords and property specialists and keep up-to-date with industry news and upcoming events via our newsletter.